#MANAGEMENT GESUNDHEIT SOZIALES HOW TO#
#MANAGEMENT GESUNDHEIT SOZIALES FULL#

real-world scenario/data)? Are the validation results convincing (or at least good enough to stimulate interesting discussions at the event)? implementation, case study, action research, survey), and is the chosen method adequate for the presented contribution type? How deep do the validation and its presentation in the paper go (e.g., application to fictitious example vs. Does the paper contain a validation section? Which validation method/form was used (e.g.Is the research contribution convincing? Does it solve the problem, is it new, does it advance the state of the art sufficiently (over existing work from same authors and from others in community, both academia and industry)? Is the contribution comprehensive and mature enough for the publication type (workshop, conference, journal)? Does it work (in theory, in practice)? Does the paper contain enough information to reproduce the research results?.CFP and in general, is it open or partially open (so not solved yet)? Is the research problem motivated and articulated well? Is it relevant w.r.t.Is the context established (domain/area, previous work)?.

#MANAGEMENT GESUNDHEIT SOZIALES FULL#

Does the paper type get clear and match with the Call for Papers (CFP), e.g., full research paper vs.

If you want to make the reviewers' job as easy as possible (which is a good thing), help them answer these questions: Remember these review dimensions (for research papers): a) relevance of paper content and research contribution, b) quality of content/contribution: technical soundness, depth, novelty, c) research approach/method incuding validation and d) editorial quality and maturity.

#MANAGEMENT GESUNDHEIT SOZIALES HOW TO#

A former editor-in-chief of IEE Software writes about how to write high quality papers (for IEEE Software). This Technical Report from the SEI has information on how to conduct surveys. The Design Science Methodology and supporting tutorial prsentations by R.

Shaw from ICSE 2003, Writing Good Software Engineering Research Papers and/or this presentation by I. When planning and executing validation activities, make sure to follow the guidelines in the Mini Tutorial by M. Zimmermann,В IEEE Software, Volume 30, Number 6 (2013).ДЇor advice on research projects and thesis writing, start here: Writer's Workshops are an intense way to improve technical writing (not just patterns)ДЇorВ more patterns history, read Twenty Years of Patterns' Impact, by G.Linda RisingвЂ™s Pattern Almanac lists and summarizes patterns published prior to 2000.Ward CunninghamвЂ™s Wiki is rich in content (by the way, this is first wiki that has *ever* been built).there is a pattern languages for pattern writing) The Hillside Group gives advice here (e.g.The patterns community also has a lot to offer when it comes to technical writing (and knowledge sharing): Last but not least in this list: a pointers to information about netiquette.Corresponding project plans, updates, results online? Avoid some common e-mail anti patterns.Verhein-Jarren, Springer-Verlag (in German) Rogers, Springer-Verlag (you might be able to find a PDFВ version elsewhere)

Mastering Scientific and Medical Writing - A Self-Help Guide by S.

Hohpe lists some essentials and suggests books

Writing for Busy People, a rambling by G.

The ARC project team found the following resources useful: Updates can be found in this blog post and in this blog post.